Liminality in organizational change
Searched over 200M research papers
Research Analysis by Consensus
Consensus Meter
Liminality in Organizational Change
Introduction to Liminality in Organizational Contexts
Liminality, a concept derived from anthropology, refers to a state of being "betwixt and between" traditional structures and roles. In organizational change, liminality describes the transitional phases where old structures are dismantled, and new ones are yet to be fully established. This state of in-betweenness can significantly impact both individual and organizational learning, identity, and the overall change process.
Liminality and Organizational Learning
Impact on Individual and Organizational Learning
Liminality plays a crucial role in how learning occurs within organizations undergoing change. As industries increasingly adopt temporary project teams, the traditional boundaries of organizations are challenged, leading to new ways of organizing work and developing knowledge. This shift necessitates a rethinking of how learning and knowledge development take place, as individuals and organizations navigate these transient states. The use of temporary teams and individualized careers, fashioned out of liminality, impacts organizational learning by fostering environments where learning occurs at the edges of organizational boundaries.
Episodic Change and Social Drama
Episodic organizational change can be understood through the lens of social drama, where conflict triggers and drives the liminal transition. This perspective highlights the opportunities and threats inherent in liminal transitions and emphasizes the role of leaders in re-establishing social order during these times. Conflict, while often seen as disruptive, can be productive in challenging, developing, and transforming social realities within organizations. This approach encourages reflexive thinking about the change processes and the liminal quality inherent in these transitions.
Temporary Employees and Organizational Flexibility
Temporary Employees as Liminal Subjects
In flexible and transient organizational structures, temporary employees occupy a liminal position, being "betwixt and between" the fixed positions of full-time employment. This ambiguous status presents both risks and opportunities for individuals and organizations. The transient nature of temporary work fosters cultural creativity, challenging old perspectives on work and subjectivity while creating new ones. This environment also leads to the development of transient and episodic communities within the workplace, further emphasizing the liminal experience.
Organizational Liminality and Creativity
Organizations on the margins of institutional fields often exhibit a blend of institutional and anti-institutional characteristics, a phenomenon termed organizational liminality. This intentional strategy allows these organizations to resist the homogenizing tendencies of modern organizational life, producing unique resources and liabilities. By embracing formalized liminality, these organizations can foster creativity and innovation, leveraging their unique position to navigate and influence their institutional environments.
Managing Liminality During Organizational Change
Professional Care in Transitional Organizations
The concept of liminality is also applicable in understanding the experiences of professionals in organizations undergoing significant changes, such as privatization. Health professionals, for instance, operate in a dual space as both managers of the ritual process and individuals experiencing their own liminal journey. Despite the tensions arising from organizational restructuring, professionals strive to provide quality care, highlighting the complex interplay between personal and organizational liminality.
Continuous Change and Liminal Affective Technologies
In educational contexts, the implementation of flexible timetables as a liminal affective technology aims to disrupt traditional structures and foster a more adaptable organization. However, this transition can induce ambivalence and volatility among participants, leading to unexpected side effects such as paralysis and polarization. Effective management of these liminal experiences requires a sensitive balancing act, termed liminal affective leadership, to navigate the volatile emotions and dynamics that arise during continuous change.
Conclusion
Liminality in organizational change presents both challenges and opportunities. It disrupts traditional boundaries, fostering environments ripe for learning, creativity, and innovation. However, it also requires careful management to navigate the inherent ambiguities and tensions. Understanding and leveraging the concept of liminality can provide valuable insights into the processes of organizational change, helping leaders and organizations to adapt and thrive in transitional states.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic