Searched over 200M research papers
10 papers analyzed
These studies suggest that GIS-based methods and various indices (such as CCI, FCI, and spatial indices) are effective in evaluating and measuring urban compactness, aiding in sustainable urban planning and decision-making.
20 papers analyzed
Urban compactness is a critical concept in sustainable urban planning, aiming to create efficient, livable, and environmentally friendly cities. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a pivotal role in measuring and analyzing urban compactness, providing valuable insights for urban planners and policymakers. This article synthesizes recent research on urban compactness using GIS, highlighting various methodologies and findings from different global contexts.
A study focusing on Dhaka, Bangladesh, utilized GIS to evaluate urban compactness at the neighborhood level, addressing a significant research gap in developing countries. The study developed a Composite Compactness Index (CCI) using six indicators: population density, evenness of development, clustering nature of development, land-use diversity, floor use mix, and road network connectivity. The results classified neighborhoods into low, moderate, and high compactness categories, providing a preliminary guideline for urban planners to enhance compactness and sustainability.
In Lithuania, a methodology integrating game theory with GIS was employed to evaluate city compactness. This approach helped identify urban fabric density issues and provided a data bank of population, public transport stops, and places of public attraction. The analysis, visualized through diagrams, highlighted the most problematic areas, aiding city planners in making informed decisions to enhance urban compactness.
A study in Bialystok, Poland, used GIS and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to identify compact urban areas with fully developed functional and spatial structures. This method provided measurable criteria for urban compactness, resulting in maps that categorized the study area based on development levels. This approach supports urban policy promoting compact city concepts, crucial for sustainable urban planning.
Research in Metro Vancouver, Canada, developed a spatial index for three-dimensional (3D) urban compactness, considering vertical development growth. The index, based on parameters like vertical urban growth suitability, land designation, and average building height, projected urban compactness growth over 30 years. The findings indicated concentrations of compactness growth near densely populated and transportation-oriented locations, aiding local governments in future planning.
A novel Functional Compactness Index (FCI) was introduced to quantify urban functional compactness by integrating multiple geospatial data sources, including Points of Interest (POIs), Road Network data, and nighttime light data. The FCI effectively reflected human activity intensity, functional zone differentiation, and mixing degree of different zones. This index provided a comprehensive measure of urban compactness, useful for urban planning and comparative analysis among cities.
A study proposed new geometric interpretations and indicators for urban compactness, focusing on diameter and perimeter. These indicators were applied to theoretical shapes and English urban areas, offering insights into the core concept of compactness. Additional indicators like 'built compactness' and 'population compactness' were suggested to enhance the understanding and measurement of urban compactness.
Research on 160 Chinese cities measured urban compactness using density and mixed land use. Spatial autocorrelation analysis identified clustering patterns, and regression models explored relationships between compactness and various factors. The study revealed significant spatial clustering of compactness values and provided a new approach to measure urban compactness, aiding in policy-making based on local conditions.
A study on Kigali, Rwanda, analyzed urban form using GIS to evaluate physical compactness. The findings indicated a decrease in compact form due to haphazard development and lack of regulatory control. The study provided suggestive measures for sustainable urban development, emphasizing the need for regularity authority control.
GIS-based methodologies offer robust tools for measuring and analyzing urban compactness, providing critical insights for sustainable urban planning. From neighborhood-level evaluations to three-dimensional growth projections, these studies highlight the diverse applications and benefits of GIS in urban compactness research. By integrating various indicators and data sources, urban planners can develop more efficient, livable, and sustainable cities.
Most relevant research papers on this topic
vaping