write a thesis title about human protection from Autonomous Weapon Systems in international law

Thesis Title:

"Human Protection from Autonomous Weapon Systems in International Law: Ensuring Human Control and Upholding Human Rights"

Justification:

This title encapsulates the core issues discussed in the provided research papers, focusing on the necessity of human control over autonomous weapon systems (AWS) and the protection of human rights under international law.

Supporting Citations:

Human Rights and AWS: The importance of human rights in the context of AWS is emphasized, arguing that meaningful human control is essential to comply with international human rights law, particularly the right to life and privacy.
Legal Obligations and Human Control: The deployment of AWS in military operations necessitates human control, which is not only a political demand but also a legal obligation derived from international humanitarian law.
Human Dignity and Moral Agency: The delegation of lethal decision-making to AWS erodes human dignity and moral agency, which are crucial for maintaining international law and ethical standards.
International Prohibition and Human Rights: Establishing an international prohibition on AWS is argued to be necessary based on human rights and humanitarian principles, ensuring that lethal force is not used without human judgment.
Positive Human Rights Obligations: States have positive human rights obligations to ensure that AWS are used in a manner that complies with the right to life and other human rights, particularly in law enforcement operations.
Domestic Law Enforcement and Human Rights: The use of AWS in domestic law enforcement raises significant human rights concerns, particularly regarding the right to life and dignity, necessitating higher standards of human control.

By integrating these perspectives, the thesis title reflects a comprehensive approach to addressing the legal and ethical challenges posed by AWS, emphasizing the need for human oversight to protect fundamental human rights.

Write a thesis title about human protection from Autonomous Weapon Systems in international law

Summary

Thesis Title:

Justification:

Supporting Citations:

Sources and full results

What Do Human Rights Really Say About the Use of Autonomous Weapons Systems for Law Enforcement Purposes?

Human rights law clarifies that the only acceptable definition of autonomy in weapons systems for law enforcement purposes requires meaningful human control, suggesting a ban on fully autonomous machines is desirable.

Autonomous Weapon Systems and Human Control

Human control over autonomous weapon systems is a legal obligation derived from international humanitarian law, not just a political demand.

Fighting Machines: Autonomous Weapons and Human Dignity, Dan Saxon (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2022), 264 pp., cloth $75, eBook $75.

International law, it is a fundamental principle that should guide the use of lethal autonomous weapon systems to preserve moral agency and human dignity.

On banning autonomous weapon systems: human rights, automation, and the dehumanization of lethal decision-making

An international ban on autonomous weapon systems is justified by human rights and humanitarian principles, ensuring that lethal decisions are made by humans and not machines.

POSITIVE HUMAN RIGHTS OBLIGATION OF STATES AND THE USE OF AUTONOMOUS WEAPON SYSTEMS DURING LAW ENFORCEMENT OPERATIONS

Autonomous weapon systems in law enforcement operations may violate human rights, particularly the right to life, as they cannot comply with existing case law on the right to life.

Human Rights and the use of Autonomous Weapons Systems (AWS) During Domestic Law Enforcement

Fully autonomous weapons systems should not be used in law enforcement due to their potential impact on bodily integrity and dignity, and their lack of meaningful human control.

Autonomous Weapons and International Humanitarian Law: Advantages, Open Technical Questions and Legal Issues to be Clarified

Autonomous weapon systems may improve respect for international humanitarian law if they can accurately perceive and apply IHL, but accountability, performance evaluation, and precautions must be clarified.

Autonomous Weapons and Human Responsibilities

Autonomous weapons pose legal, ethical, and societal challenges, with human judgment being crucial for assigning accountability and addressing legal concerns.

Prohibiting Autonomous Weapons: Put Human Dignity First

The strongest argument for a ban on autonomous weapons systems is the principle of distinction, but technological progress may render this argument obsolete and may undermine the principle of human dignity.

War Torts: Accountability for Autonomous Weapons

Autonomous weapon systems may commit war crimes without intentional or reckless actions, necessitating a legal regime to hold states accountable for injurious wrongs caused by their use.

Try another search